Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
As U.S. states race to define their positions on artificial intelligence (AI), questions about educational equity and the role of public education remain unresolved. This paper presents a qualitative policy analysis of official state-issued guidance documents, examining how states conceptualize AI in relation to public K–12 education and equity. Drawing on Orlikowski and Iacono’s (2001) typology of IT conceptualizations and a multidimensional equity framework (McDermott et al., 2013), the study reveals patterns in how AI is framed (e.g., tool, threat, agent of change) and the extent to which equity is meaningfully addressed. Findings offer insight into the tensions between innovation, governance, and justice, highlighting implications for leadership, policy design, and democratic accountability.