Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This study examines how graduate students adopt generative AI tools in academic settings, drawing on survey data from Chinese research universities. Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model, we explore how perceived usefulness, ease of use, and external influence shape behavioral intention, with attention to gender, education level, and disciplinary differences. Findings reveal that social and institutional contexts—not usability—are the primary drivers of adoption. Quantitative disciplines show stronger uptake than fields like medicine, reflecting distinct epistemological orientations. Female students value AI’s efficiency benefits more than males, potentially linked to academic workload disparities. These results highlight the sociocultural embeddedness of AI adoption and call for discipline-sensitive, equity-aware approaches to integrating emerging technologies in higher education.