Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
Many students struggle to accurately judge what they know, which may hinder learning and motivation. Yet teachers often lack tools to support metacognitive development. This study tested a scalable approach by enhancing math exit tickets with prompts to reflect on students’ confidence and accuracy. Sixty-one ninth-graders were randomly assigned to a control or reflection condition and completed seven exit tickets. For each ticket, the reflection group rated their confidence, received accuracy feedback, and completed a brief reflection exercise, while the control group received only accuracy feedback. The results offer encouraging signs that students engaged meaningfully with the reflections, and those in the reflection group reported greater use of metacognitive strategies and a marginal increase in mastery-approach goals after the intervention.
Xinran Wang, Vanderbilt University
Jerry Nelluvelil, Harvard University
Madeleine Kingan, Harvard University
Rebecca Adler, Vanderbilt University
Lingfei Cao, Vanderbilt University
Cristina D. Zepeda, Vanderbilt University
Jon R. Star, Harvard University
Bethany Rittle-Johnson, Vanderbilt University
Kelley Durkin, Vanderbilt University