Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This study investigates how students engage in self-assessment tasks in a college engineering statistics course using the Expectancy-Value Theory framework. Through thematic analysis of open-ended responses, we explored how students' motivational beliefs—expectancy, value, and cost—influence their engagement. Findings revealed varied patterns shaped by confidence, relevance, emotional responses, and academic identity. While some students found self-assessment valuable for reflection and growth, others viewed it as burdensome or irrelevant. Differences emerged across gender, academic level, and performance. Emotional factors, often underexamined in traditional models, strongly predicted engagement quality. This research offers insights into student motivation and highlights the importance of designing self-assessment activities that promote autonomy, relevance, and psychological safety in college STEM education.