Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely used in academic writing, yet little is known about how different AI-use patterns relate to learning outcomes. We adopted a person-centered approach to examine AI-use profiles, their predictors, and associated outcomes. Survey data from 1,073 UK postgraduate students were analyzed using latent profile analysis, revealing three profiles: transformation explorers, tech-driven users, and balanced users. Profile membership was predicted by academic discipline and AI-use frequency. Learning outcomes varied across profiles: transformation explorers reported the highest critical thinking and perceived improvement, tech-driven users showed the greatest motivation, while balanced users had moderate outcomes. By adopting a person-centered approach, this study pushes theoretical discussions beyond a binary view of AI as either “beneficial” or “detrimental”.