Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This study examines how classroom culture regulates undergraduates' perceptions of self-generated feedback usefulness by focusing on disciplinary learning. Through an interview study, we reveal how mathematical norms create a paradox: while students recognize the metacognitive value of this feedback, they demand external validation due to sociomathematical norms of teacher authority and mathematical norms of binary correctness and rigor. Crucially, even proponents restrict self-feedback use to low-stakes contexts, revealing how disciplinary epistemologies override generic student assessment literacy principles. Our findings demonstrate how students negotiate these cultural factors when choosing feedback sources, with self-generated feedback being reserved for low-stakes contexts. The study advances student assessment literacy research by mapping how disciplinary classroom culture filters students' feedback perception and adoption processes.