Paper Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Navigating Anti-CRT Legislation: Black Chief Diversity Officers' Experiences in Higher Education

Thu, April 9, 7:45 to 9:15am PDT (7:45 to 9:15am PDT), JW Marriott Los Angeles L.A. LIVE, Floor: 2nd Floor, Platinum H

Abstract

This research examines the complex challenges faced by Black Chief Diversity Officers (CDOs) at predominantly White institutions (PWIs) during the widespread anti-critical Race Theory legislative movement. Using Critical Race Theory as a theoretical framework, this qualitative critical case study analyzed the experiences of ten Black CDOs across multiple states with active anti-CRT legislation. The study reveals how these restrictive laws create significant obstacles for Black CDOs attempting to fulfill their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) responsibilities. Participants described encountering a "copy-and-paste" phenomenon across state legislation that consistently aims to limit DEI training and discussions that might cause discomfort based on racial or gender identities. The research documents how CDOs have been forced to adapt their approaches, changing workshop materials, renaming programs, and modifying terminology while still attempting to address systemic racism within their institutions.

Beyond the operational challenges, the study highlights the profound psychological and professional toll on Black CDOs, who face isolation, increased scrutiny, and threats of defunding. Many participants reported being the sole Black executive on leadership teams while navigating microaggressions and institutional resistance. The findings demonstrate how anti-CRT legislation not only restricts institutional racial discourse but also places Black CDOs in the untenable position of promoting inclusion while being legally constrained from addressing the very systemic issues their roles were designed to combat. This research contributes crucial insights into how political restrictions on racial discourse impact higher education professionals and offers recommendations for institutional support systems and adaptive strategies for sustaining DEI work under hostile legislative conditions.

Author