Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This exploratory study examines how time and effort are allocated during a narrative across think-aloud and non-think-aloud conditions. Sentence-level response times from 19 college students were analyzed using principal components analysis to identify shifts in cognitive effort. In the non-think-aloud condition, readers with higher fluency scores demonstrated slower timing at inference points, suggesting strategic effort. In the think-aloud condition, readers with mid-range scores demonstrated variable pacing, possibly reflecting different self-regulatory approaches or greater cognitive demand. These findings suggest the utility of timing data during narrative contexts, though further analysis of verbal responses is needed to clarify strategy use. This work lays a foundation for future research with adults in literacy programs and for process-sensitive approaches to assessment.