Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This paper characterizes feedback generated for teachers rehearsing improvisational decision-making during a student-centered mathematics discussion in a GenAI-powered simulation. The analysis sought to describe the nature of the feedback concerning high and low-quality pre-designed teacher questions. Across 12 iterations of the same simulation using a sample representation of teacher responses, a majority of the feedback to high-quality responses placed a strong emphasis on the value of incremental time-expansive clarifications of students’ mathematical ideas. In contrast, the feedback to low-quality responses emphasized changing time-efficient corrections to time-expansive clarifications. With these results, the paper recommends future development of design-analysis pairings of generated feedback within simulations that offer incremental feedback to teachers’ improvisational decision making, rooted in expertise in mathematics teacher education.