Paper Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Claiming Creativity

Sun, April 12, 11:45am to 1:15pm PDT (11:45am to 1:15pm PDT), Los Angeles Convention Center, Floor: Level Two, Poster Hall - Exhibit Hall A

Abstract

This qualitative study explores how individuals define and evaluate creativity in mathematics, revealing tensions between stated beliefs and actual evaluative practices. Through interviews with three doctoral students—who solved a math task, reflected on their processes, and evaluated peer work—three recurring contradictions emerged: (1) broad definitions vs. narrow evaluations, (2) generous assessments of others vs. harsh self-evaluations, and (3) valuing external products over internal processes. The study highlights how emotional, cognitive, and sociocultural factors shape perceptions of creativity. Findings suggest a need to reimagine how creativity is recognized and supported in mathematics education, with implications for both assessment practices and learner identity development.

Author