Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This study investigates the curricular foundations of STEM education doctoral programs in the U.S., addressing inconsistencies in how such programs define and enact “STEM.” Using qualitative content analysis and Goodwin & Kosnik’s (2013) teacher education knowledge bases framework, we analyzed course offerings from 20 doctoral programs labeled STEM or STEAM. Findings show a dominant emphasis on contextual and pedagogical knowledge—primarily in science and mathematics—while personal, sociological, and social knowledge bases are underrepresented. Programs often adopt the “STEM” label without curricular integration of all four disciplines. This study highlights the need for conceptual clarity and broader preparation of future STEM teacher educators, particularly in areas of identity, equity, and systemic change.