Paper Summary
Share...

Direct link:

First, Do No Harm. But Can We Do Better? An Evaluation of a Corequisite Reform

Wed, April 8, 7:45am to Sun, April 12, 3:00pm PDT (Wed, April 8, 7:45am to Sun, April 12, 3:00pm PDT), Virtual Posters Exhibit Hall, Virtual Poster Hall

Abstract

College readiness is a continuum, not a dichotomy. Multiple readiness cutoffs, combined with multiple math pathways, create a rich set of course options for community college students. We use data from the Kentucky Community and Technical College System (KCTCS) to describe student course selection patterns around various readiness cutoffs and estimate their effects on first-year college outcomes using regression discontinuity. For students with very low initial skills in math and English, requiring a prerequisite course produces null or negative effects. However, students with very low math skills benefit from taking corequisite non-college algebra courses. For students with relatively high initial skills, KCTCS’s policy has positive effects in both English (through mainstreaming) and math (through math pathway reforms).

Authors