Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
Reliable group comparisons in structural equation modeling (SEM) rest on measurement invariance, yet fit index cut offs derived from continuous data often misfire with ordinal indicators. We gauged the diagnostic accuracy of ΔCFI, ΔRMSEA, and ΔSRMR via Monte Carlo simulations that varied sample size (200, 400, 1,000), group size ratio (1:1 vs. 1:2), model complexity, latent response distribution, Likert format (3 , 5 , 7 point), and noninvariance pattern (metric vs. scalar; bias magnitude and proportion). Using robust estimators (ML SB, WLSMV) and ROC analysis, ΔCFI and ΔRMSEA outperformed ΔSRMR—especially for scalar noninvariance—yet required stricter cut offs (< 0.01 CFI; < 0.015 RMSEA). ΔSRMR showed inflated false positive rates and low power, underscoring the need for context specific thresholds and robust estimation.