Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This study examines the politicization of social-emotional learning (SEL) policy discourse in the United States from 2015–2025, analyzing ideological tensions across Democratic, Republican, and politically mixed states. Employing critical discourse analysis informed by Bourdieu’s field theory, it identifies divergent framings: Democratic states (e.g., California) position SEL as integral to equity and whole-child education, whereas Republican states (e.g., Florida, Texas) delegitimize SEL as ideological indoctrination. Politically mixed states (e.g., Michigan, Wisconsin) display contested narratives, reflecting local ideological struggles. Findings highlight significant implications for culturally responsive leadership, revealing how symbolic conflicts over educational legitimacy shape SEL implementation. Recommendations emphasize political navigation, inclusive stakeholder engagement, and strategic framing to sustain equitable SEL practices amid polarization.