Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This study investigates pre-service teachers’ reflective responses to generative AI through linguistic analysis of online discussions across four asynchronous courses. Using LIWC and SBERT, four distinct reflection patterns emerged: Critical Analysts, Strategic Thinkers, Personal Reflectors, and Practical Problem-Solvers. The clustering and linguistic analysis revealed different language use in the high-emotion/high-self-reflection and information-focused groups. The former showed a high frequency of using affective and introspective language, while the latter used formal and analytic language. Reflection styles varied by course context and evolved over time, influenced by assignment design. Findings suggest that reflection is shaped by pedagogical context. The study demonstrates the value of computational linguistics in capturing emotional, cognitive, and temporal dimensions of reflections in online course discussions.