Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This paper examines standardized patient (SP) simulation as a contested epistemic space shaped by institutional priorities, cultural assumptions, and informal acts of resistance. Drawing on 35 interviews with SP educators and over a decade of ethnographic research, it critically examines how the dominant model of “medical realism”—framed through fidelity, standardization, and objectivity—limits inclusive, health equity-oriented simulation pedagogy. Through everyday small-scale interventions, SP educators enact what Stetsenko (2008) calls a “transformative activist stance,” challenging reductive portrayals and reimagining simulation as a site of epistemic plurality and social justice. This paper contributes to critical health professions education research by proposing a new framework for understanding simulation fidelity, medical realism, inclusive standard-setting practices, and health equity-oriented medical training.