Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
In undergraduate STEM courses, active learning improves student comprehension and reduces failure rates. Tools like the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) mainly distinguish active from didactic teaching, not specific pedagogical approaches. Identifying these approaches at scale is challenging due to time-intensive and subjective protocols. COPUS offers a more objective and efficient alternative. Although not designed for this purpose, we hypothesize that recognizable patterns in COPUS behaviors may indicate specific approaches. We analyzed class recordings and interviewed faculty to link COPUS-observable behaviors with instructors’ intentional pedagogical methods. Our findings suggest COPUS can reasonably identify distinct teaching strategies but struggles to distinguish similar approaches, such as POGIL and worksheet activities. This work aims to support evidence-based instructional practices in STEM education.