Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This study investigates the integration and educational impact of a contextually grounded generative AI (GenAI) feedback tool within a Human-Centered Design (HCD) course at a U.S. university during Spring 2025. Guided by design-based research (DBR) and mixed methods, the paper answers: How did students engage with the rubric-aligned AI feedback tool, and what types of feedback-seeking behaviors emerged? Analysis of post-course survey responses and student-AI chat transcripts reveals varied interaction patterns ranging from clarification to co-creative dialogue. Findings indicate that the AI tool functioned beyond mere assessment, serving instead as a collaborative conversational partner. The paper highlights pedagogical implications for framing feedback as a dynamic, human-AI co-creative process, emphasizing the necessity of developing critical AI literacy and reflective skills among students.
Akash Kumar Saini, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Saadeddine S. Shehab, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
William Cope, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mary Kalantzis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Duane Searsmith, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Vania Castro, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Amber Dewey Schultz, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign