Comprehensive Assessment in Mathematics Education: Exploring Practices, Challenges, and Recommendations

• In Event: Division H VP Session: Past Designs, Present Tensions, Future Paths: Reimagining Educational Assessment Across Contexts

Abstract

Assessment in mathematics education is a multi-faceted process with significant implications for student learning. This research paper offers a comprehensive exploration of assessment in mathematics education, encompassing both traditional and innovative approaches. The paper begins by highlighting the critical role assessment plays in diagnosing students' prior knowledge, monitoring their progress, and informing instructional decisions. It underscores the distinction between large-scale assessments, used for broader comparisons, and classroom assessments, essential for daily instruction. Traditional assessments tend to focus narrowly on content knowledge, overlooking crucial aspects like problem-solving skills and mathematical reasoning. This document analysis emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate assessment tools tailored to specific educational objectives. The research paper advocates for a more inclusive approach to assessment that incorporates these critical elements. Furthermore, the paper delves into the diverse perspectives of stakeholders involved in mathematics education and the challenges of meeting their distinct needs. It advocates for the ethical dimension of assessment and the need for fairness and impartiality. In addition to this, the research paper examines emerging trends in assessment, including formative assessment, diversified assessment, and performance-based assessment. It discusses their impact on student learning outcomes, offering insights for educators and policymakers. Overall, this research paper aims to provide a holistic understanding of assessment in mathematics education, encouraging educators and policymakers to adopt innovative practices that promote equitable, effective, and meaningful learning experiences for all students.

Authors

• Divya Gautam, Indian Institute Of Technology Gandhinagar

• Sneha Abhishek, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar