Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This study challenges the deficit-focused “leaky pipeline” metaphor by examining how individuals construct purposeful narratives when transitioning away from traditional science careers. Drawing on Career Construction Theory (Savickas, 2013) and Purpose Development Theory (Damon, 2008), we analyzed open-ended survey responses from 76 post-baccalaureate, former STEM majors: Science-Adjacent individuals who pivoted to non-traditional science roles and Science-Leavers who exited science entirely. Thematic analysis revealed six purpose-related themes guiding career decisions, highlighting meaningful re-optimizations and transformations rather than simple attrition. Differences between groups illuminate how personal meaning, perceived impact, and identity shape divergent trajectories. Findings suggest that science career advising must address both purpose and motivation, supporting diverse pathways that align with individuals’ evolving goals, values, and well-being.