Paper Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Lexington Student Research and Publication Collaborative (Poster 39)

Thu, April 9, 2:15 to 3:45pm PDT (2:15 to 3:45pm PDT), Los Angeles Convention Center, Floor: Level Two, Poster Hall - Exhibit Hall A

Abstract

As high school student researchers, we asked the question: In what ways do pressures within high school communities influence students’ perspectives on justifying or rejecting the use of ChatGPT? While our current project incorporates a 2025 comparative analysis with 40 student interview participants, in 2023, we interviewed 24 secondary students and conducted a thematic discourse analysis under the intersectional lenses of social goods (Gee, 2014), Figured Worlds (Holland et al., 1998), and positioning theory (Holland et al., 1998; Ingram & Elliott, 2019). We found that participants did not interpret a binary accept-or-reject stance on ChatGPT; instead, the social goods of their Figured Worlds and surrounding pressures influenced the extent to which they positioned ChatGPT as a tool to gain agency.

Authors