Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
Session Type: Roundtable Session
This session examines how generative AI can (and cannot) serve as instructional scaffolding across diverse learning contexts—from social studies supports for ELLs to long-term effects on critical thinking, theoretical lenses for tool evaluation, and promoting self-regulated learning in graduate research. Together, the papers link practical evaluations, experimental evidence, and a multi-paradigmatic framework to surface design principles, equity concerns, and mechanisms by which AI scaffolds foster metacognition and learning outcomes.
Looking for help: A test to see if AI can help create social studies scaffolds that provide key assistance for ELLs - Tierney B Hinman, Auburn University; Jesus Tirado, Auburn University; Jamie Harrison, Auburn University; Matthew F. Summerlin, Auburn University; Megan Andrews, Auburn University; Sarah I. Bailey, Opelika City Schools; Anna Poole, Auburn University
Use of AI-based Scaffolding in Writing: Longitudinal Impact on Critical Thinking - Qi Sun, University at Albany - SUNY; Alanda Joseph, University at Albany - SUNY; Cong Wu, University at Albany - SUNY; Gabriel Schlomer, University at Albany - SUNY; Tianlin Wang, University at Albany - SUNY
A Multi-Paradigmatic Perspective Towards the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Education - Haidee A. Jackson, University of Texas - Permian Basin; Suman Rath, Montclair State University
AI Scaffolding for Self-Regulated Learning in Graduate Research: A Mixed-Methods Study - Jiahui Qi, East China Normal University; Jun Xu, East China Normal University; Yutian Gao, East China Normal University