Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of this study is to describe quantitative instruments related to mathematics teacher behavior and affect. We found 108 different measures published in 24 mathematics education journals from 2000-2020. Of the 51 named measures, 34 were surveys or questionnaires, 14 were observation protocols, and 3 were assessments. Authors most frequently reported evidence related to test content and response processes, as well as reliabilities. Few studies reported evidence related to internal structure, relations to other variables, or consequences of testing. The measures found predominantly examined teachers’ beliefs about teaching mathematics or teaching practices. Only two measures were related to equity. We need to create measures that are focused on equity and that have validity and reliability evidence.
Melissa A. Gallagher, University of Houston
Emanuele Bardelli, University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Timothy Donald Folger, Bowling Green State University
Adrian Neely
Jonathan David Bostic, Bowling Green State University
Temple A. Walkowiak, North Carolina State University
Anne Garrison Wilhelm, Southern Methodist University
Jeremy Zelkowski, The University of Alabama