Paper Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Mirrors, Windows, Frames, and Foundations: A Pathway to Develop Elementary Ethnic Studies Educators

Mon, April 25, 11:30am to 1:00pm PDT (11:30am to 1:00pm PDT), Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina, Floor: South Bulding, Level 3, Del Mar

Abstract

Objectives & Research Questions
Ethnic Studies is growing rapidly in secondary settings and becoming a high school graduation requirement across states like California (Strauss, 2014). Noting the benefits of Ethnic Studies in secondary settings, research has begun to examine Ethnic Studies in elementary settings (Author, 2017; 2018). Although some elementary programs may prepare candidates to implement some Ethnic Studies approaches, it is often relegated to one course or instructor. This study examines the development and implementation of an elementary credential cohort that embeds Ethnic Studies pedagogies across all coursework and student teaching placements. The questions that guide this study are: 1) How can elementary teacher preparation programs identify and develop instructors to prepare teacher candidates to teach Ethnic Studies? 2) How can teacher preparation programs align curriculum across subject matter to prepare candidates to teach Ethnic Studies? 3) How do teacher candidates apply their Ethnic Studies preparation in the field?

Theory
Ample research has highlighted the benefits of Ethnic Studies at the high school level: student empowerment, increased student attendance, engagement, GPA, and graduation rates (Cabrera, Milem, & Marx, 2012; Dee & Penner, 2016). Drawing from theories on K-12 applications of Ethnic Studies (Reyes McGovern & Buenavista, 2016; Tintiangco-Cubales et al., 2014), instructors within the cohort met to co-develop a shared understanding of Ethnic Studies. The cohort indentified the following tenets: 1) culturally relevant 2) community responsive 3) social action 4) anti-racist & decolonial 4) Intersectional and 5) Humanizing. These tenets were applied across coursework, fieldwork, and student teaching.

Methods/Sources
This case study seeks to analyze the cohort instructors’ teaching practice (Hammersley & Atkinson, 1983) in preparing elementary Ethnic Studies teachers. The study blends case study methods (Yin, 2006) and autoethnographic methods (Anderson-Levvit, 2006) to examine the intimate and complex processes of co-creating Ethnic Studies teacher preparation curriculum across our cohort coursework. Course artifacts (syllabi, assignments, lesson plans, etc.) were examined, followed by focus group interviews with teacher candidates to examine their interactions with the program curriculum and application in student teaching. Data were coded using a descriptive approach (Saldana, 2013), creating analytic memos to examine the relationship between program instructor Ethnic Studies professional development, curriculum development and teaching, and teacher candidate application of Ethnic Studies in the field.

Findings
Findings suggest that teacher candidates felt most prepared to embed Ethnic Studies approaches in the humanities, and less prepared to apply it in math and science. Teacher candidates also reported a disconnect between coursework preparation and what they observe in student teaching placements, often feeling as though Ethnic Studies approaches were not welcomed.

Significance
This innovative study adds to the growing research base on Ethnic Studies in K-12 schools. The examination of a teacher pathway for elementary educators is especially noteworthy as this caveat is often overlooked. This research identifies strengths and areas of growth that can serve as a model for elementary credential programs across the state and nation.

Author