Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Sign In
X (Twitter)
We use exit survey data from 17 teacher education programs in four states to compare self-ratings of preparedness between two cohorts of teacher candidates: 2019 graduates who had “normal” student teaching experiences (n=1,334, 82% response rate) and 2020 graduates (n=1,447, 79% response rate), whose in-person student teaching was shortened by 6-10 weeks (38-83% of their placement) during the spring 2020 COVID-19 school closures. Our mixed methods analysis finds that teacher candidates with disrupted student teaching experiences rated themselves as more prepared than teacher candidates who had a full student teaching experience, and we explore the meaning and implication of this counterintuitive finding through a theoretical lens of self-efficacy.