Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper invests with Elizabeth de Freitas’s (2014) topo-philosophical argument about line as “the engine of theory” (p. 285). There are two observed surfaces across which this investment with line moves. First is the sticky and striated surface of college student identity development theory. Second is the more wiggly, sometimes smoother space of arts-engaged methodology. More than metaphorically, lines were a type of research-creation (Springgay &Truman, 2016), operating as method and as a conceptual lens for speculation. The work joins recent moves by student development scholars interested in expanding analyses of the discursive constitution of collegian subjectivity (Abes, Jones & Stewart, 2019; Smithers & Eaton, 2017). The work also advocates and illustrates the transformative potential of participatory arts-engaged inquiry.