Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Evaluating implementation has become essential for program delivery and development as high-quality implementation promotes program efficacy while poor implementation may lead to a failure of achieving desired outcomes. The study examined varying patterns of implementation with data from a randomized controlled trial of a classwide social-emotional learning program via self-report and observation of adherence, dosage, quality of delivery, and participant engagement. Latent profile analysis of the measures favored a 3-profile solution and characterized teacher implementation of the intervention as “Low-implementation”, “Low-dosage, moderate-implementation”, and “High-implementation”. Furthermore, “Low-implementation” classrooms appeared to yield significantly poorer outcomes when compared with the other two profiles. Findings from the study suggested the need to evaluate implementation multi-dimensionally using various assessment methods.