Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Sign In
X (Twitter)
We used a suite of instruments to examine undergraduate STEM instructors’ instructional practices and beliefs about inclusive STEM teaching. We assessed qualitative and quantitative data collected through classroom observations using two different observation protocols and conducted semi-structured interviews among seven faculty members from a participating institution. Data were analyzed in three formal coding rounds using a descriptive and interpretive process. We observed that when used together, the COPUS, SDI and the reflective interviews provide an in-depth analysis of qualitative and quantitative attributes of inclusive science teaching, discourse and corresponding beliefs . Such information can be used to develop professional development programs for undergraduate STEM faculty.