Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time Slot
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Conference Home Page
Conference Program Overview
Sponsors & Exhibitors
Plan Your Stay
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Housing is largely discussed as the product of capital and state policy, which determine where, at what cost, and for whom would housing be produced.
In the Israeli context, the cultural legacy of Tel Aviv, the ‘First Hebrew City’ and the model for Israeli urbanism to this day is one of a built environment produced by - and for – capital accumulation. The city’s significance for the production of Hebrew culture is therefore largely associated with its capitalist legacy, as counterculture/counterpoint to Israel’s dominant Labor culture (both pre and post-sovereignty).
Yet, as this study shows, urban workers in Tel Aviv have shaped it as a worker city in the 1930s-1940s, by appropriating the 1925 Geddes plan and producing semi-autonomous worker neighborhoods at the edges of the ‘new north’, constructing their own houses using DIY labor and finance based on their future wages. Worker self-housing was a major cultural product of the city in the 1930s-1940s, meeting not only worker socio-economic and political needs, but also shaping the city as a cultural representation of labor.
This paper examines historical elements of the built environment as cultural artifacts and questions cultural production of architecture and urbanism as the sole premise of capital.