Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time Slot
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Conference Home Page
Conference Program Overview
Sponsors & Exhibitors
Plan Your Stay
Personal Schedule
Sign In
For many pious groups, family, sexuality and gender represent three fundamental pillars of their religious, social and cultural life. In the context of ultra-orthodox groups, those pillars are often materialized through gender segregation where socialization rarely occurs with the opposite sex. In the case of Ultra-orthodox Jews, this separation starts at an early age, resulting in an entire gender segregated society. In such a context, one can wonder how this binary dynamic between heterosexual relationship as the sexual norm and exclusive social interaction with same-sex individuals affects the social and sexual practices according to gender.
I examine this question through data gathered during the ethnographic field study that I have been conducting in the Ultra-Orthodox communities in Montreal and New York City since 2015, and more particularly from three types of Hasidic women and men: those who have an open contact with secular society, those who have a discrete contact, those who decide to break away. Specifically, I analyze the discourses on homoeroticism of my respondents. This paper will lead us to rethink the ambivalence between the normalization of heterosexuality and homoeroticism as a shaping element of this orthodoxy. To respond to the theoretical question about the specificity of orthodoxies in regards with fundamentalism and the rejection of the liberal project, I will argue that orthodoxy can be define as a space of constant negotiation between the private and public discourse, or to follow Goffman between front stage and back stage.