Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Policy Area
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Keyword
Program Calendar
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Search Tips
This paper examines whether more generous housing subsidies that expand low-income households' access to high-opportunity neighborhoods can generate income gains that offset the projected rise in government costs. I study a rental voucher reform that adjusts subsidy ceilings to finer ZIP code-level rent variation, an approach criticized for increasing federal spending. This presumed trade-off, however, overlooks that income may be endogenous to location. I find that the reform resulted in a net decline in per-voucher federal spending. In high-rent areas, income gains from positive neighborhood effects partially offset higher rents, accounting for approximately one-third of the projected increase. In low-rent areas, reduced payment caps lower government spending, curb landlord overcharging and tenant over-housing, and induce labor market responses from voucher households who increase work effort to cover higher out-of-pocket rent burdens. These findings highlight real-time fiscal feedback mechanism between improved economic opportunity and the cost of programs that enable it, offering a novel insight for welfare program design: subsidies can be expanded more efficiently when beneficiary contributions scale with income.