Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Policy Area
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Keyword
Program Calendar
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Search Tips
India is the world’s largest groundwater user, with 90% used for agriculture. Groundwater, however, is a common pool resource, generating a tragedy of the commons that threatens agricultural sustainability. We develop a parsimonious model to show how a popular policy intervention — subsidizing efficient irrigation technology — can exacerbate distortions away from socially optimal groundwater extraction. We test the model's predictions by leveraging geophysical variation in extraction externalities and a $1.35 billion program subsidizing efficient irrigation. Consistent with the model's predictions, the policy's impact depends on the severity of extraction externalities: extraction falls 9.2% in low-externality areas but rises 11.0% in high-externality areas. Low-externality farmers maintain cultivation using less groundwater, while high-externality farmers cultivate more intensively. Finally, the program causes climate-adaptive responses in low-externality areas -- reducing extraction during normal rainfall and increasing it during droughts -- but the opposite pattern in high-externality areas, consistent with climate maladaptation. Our findings illustrate that the same common pool conditions that typically justify an intervention may also determine its welfare implications.