Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Policy Area
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Keyword
Program Calendar
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Search Tips
Despite widespread use of performance evaluations in the public sector, public
organizations often vary in how they respond to feedback. This study investigates how performance
shortfalls influence strategic improvement efforts in South Korea’s government-affiliated research
institutes. Drawing on the behavioral theory of the firm, we propose a threshold feedback model in
which organizations respond only when they experience a compound performance shortfall—
falling below both their own past performance standards and the performance of peer institutions.
We further argue that such responsiveness depends on organizational capacity, especially the
availability of slack resources.
Using fixed-effects panel regression on panel data from 26 public research institutes overseen by
the National Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social Sciences between 2018 and
2023, we find that single performance gaps do not lead to increased effort. Only when both internal
and comparative benchmarks are missed do organizations significantly increase research-focused
spending. In addition, we find that financial slack reduces improvement efforts following strong
performance, while human resource slack consistently dampens response to feedback, suggesting
organizational complacency.
These findings advance the public administration literature on performance management by
showing that public organizations engage in strategic, resource-bounded learning, responding
selectively and only when failure becomes sufficiently salient across multiple dimensions.