Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Policy Area
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Keyword
Program Calendar
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Search Tips
Over the past two decades, the frequency of federally declared natural disasters—and the scale of corresponding federal assistance—has increased markedly. While prior research has highlighted disparities in the distribution of disaster aid by race, ethnicity, or income, often using an intersectional approach, much of this work relies on aggregated geographic units such as counties or census tracts, limiting our understanding of individual-level experiences and intersectional inequities. This study addresses that gap by leveraging a uniquely detailed, 20-year national dataset of applications to FEMA’s Individual and Households Program (IHP). We analyze more than 25 million IHP application-level data, using a comprehensive and intersectional framework that incorporates housing tenure, household income, neighborhood wealth, reported property damage, and the severity of the weather events prompting disaster declarations. Our focus is the determinants of disparities in both the likelihood of receiving aid and the amount awarded. Our two-stage empirical strategy first estimates the probability of aid receipt, controlling disaster type and intensity, and then models the conditional allocation of funds among recipients. Our preliminary findings reveal that lower-income renters are systematically less likely to receive FEMA assistance and tend to receive smaller awards than homeowners with comparable damage levels and neighborhood conditions. These results suggest the need for federal policy reforms that better account for housing tenure and income vulnerability in disaster response frameworks. Enhancing equity in disaster aid distribution—through improved eligibility criteria, targeted outreach, and renter-specific assistance—can reduce recovery gaps and improve resilience for historically marginalized populations.