Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Policy Area
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Keyword
Program Calendar
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Search Tips
The January 2025 wildfires in the Los Angeles region sparked debate over the role of urban water utilities in wildfire preparedness and response. Social and mainstream media argued that the fire’s destruction was due to inadequate urban water management, raising a critical question: How is urban water and wildfire management integrated and coordinated in the United States? While emerging research suggests a need for stronger state-level involvement, how states currently address the fire–water nexus remains underexplored. From an Institutional Collective Action (ICA) theoretical perspective, we address this gap in the literature by analyzing fire, forestry, and water plans from all 50 states. Using a mixed-methods approach, we assess (1) the extent to which states integrate water and wildfire planning and (2) how they support coordination among local and regional actors. The results highlight current state planning efforts that address the intersection of fire and water management and offer policy recommendations to enhance integration and coordination.