Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Policy Area
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Keyword
Program Calendar
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Search Tips
This study investigates the effectiveness of lottery matching gift schemes for increasing charitable giving relative to deterministic matches of equivalent expected value and a no-match control. A key aspect is that the lottery match goes directly to the charity, and not to the donor. We recruit a sample of 1,402 online participants and randomly assign them to one of seven conditions: No Match (Control) and two sets of matching schemes of varying equivalent expected values: EV=1 (1:1 deterministic Match, 1:10% of 10 tokens, and 1:1% of 100) and EV=0.5 (2:1 deterministic Match, 1:1% of 50 tokens and 1:0.5% of 100), where one token is $0.50. Participants complete three 10-token allocation decisions for hunger-related charities where one allocation is randomly selected for realization. The 1:1 deterministic Match significantly increases giving by 15.7% compared to No Match. We find that matching schemes with a small probability of a very large amount (1% and 0.5% of 100) elicit higher rates of giving compared to No Match (p=0.02 and p=0.10 respectively) and do not statistically differ from the 1:1 deterministic Match (p=0.98 and p=0.62 respectively). Our results suggest nonprofits can use matching gift donations more efficiently through lottery matching donation schemes while increasing downstream donations.