Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Policy Area
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Keyword
Program Calendar
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Search Tips
This study investigates how local media shape public understanding of policy alternatives in the wake of focusing events like mass shootings. Using a database of several thousand local newspapers spanning three decades, I examine whether outlets in closer proximity to a mass shooting provide more sustained coverage and engage more extensively with policy discussions—such as those around gun control—than national outlets or more distant newspapers. I employ keyword-assisted topic models and large language models to identify relevant policy areas and to analyze how both journalists and public officials frame these debates. Preliminary findings suggest that geographic proximity significantly influences the scope and duration of policy coverage, with local newspapers offering richer and more sustained engagement. These findings highlight the important role local media can play in the policy process—shaping what voters learn, helping to generate public pressure on policymakers, and potentially influencing how government responds to crisis events.