Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Poster #44 - Evidence-Based Approaches to Enhancing Moral Reasoning in Juvenile Justice Settings

Saturday, November 15, 12:00 to 1:30pm, Property: Hyatt Regency Seattle, Floor: 7th Floor, Room: 710 - Regency Ballroom

Abstract

Introduction/Background: Juvenile offending is a pressing concern for communities and policymakers. It is underscored by the high rates of reoffending among young offenders. Many youth involved in the justice system struggle with moral reasoning, a factor that can contribute to their delinquent behavior. Consequently, programs that concentrate on enhancing moral reasoning skills have emerged as a pivotal element of juvenile justice reform. However, a significant knowledge gap remains regarding the effectiveness of these interventions. Research Question: This review examines whether moral reasoning programs effectively help young offenders develop better moral judgment and improve their behavior. Methods: To explore this, several studies and program evaluations were conducted, focusing on moral reasoning interventions used in juvenile justice settings. These included approaches such as moral dilemma discussion groups, Moral Reconation Therapy (MRT), and other programs that integrate cognitive-behavioral techniques with group and peer activities. The primary outcomes examined were changes in moral reasoning skills, engagement within facilities, and recidivism rates after the programs. Results/Findings: When it comes to reducing long-term reoffending, the results are less clear. Some studies have shown slight improvements, while others have found no effect at all. How well a program is run, the training staff receive, and whether additional support services such as counseling, family therapy, or educational programs are provided all play a significant role in determining the success of these interventions. Conclusion/Implications: Moral reasoning programs show considerable potential in aiding juvenile rehabilitation. For these programs to be effective, they must be implemented with care and combined with other supports that have already been proven to make a difference. At the same time, there is still a lot we do not know about their long-term effects, particularly in terms of reducing reoffending. More long-term research is needed to understand better how these interventions work over time and to determine which strategies are most effective for different groups of young people.

Author