Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Administrative Burden in the Safety Net: Spillovers and Solutions

Friday, November 14, 10:15 to 11:45am, Property: Grand Hyatt Seattle, Floor: 1st Floor/Lobby Level, Room: Princess 1

Session Submission Type: Panel

Abstract

This panel focuses on spillovers and solutions to administrative burdens in the means-tested safety net. Covering a range of programs — from TANF to tax credits — and populations across the country — from California to West Virginia — the papers on this panel present new findings on administrative burdens to better understand take-up, program attachment, and impacts on employment. Combined, the findings provide new insight for policy makers with a goal to improve the efficiency, equity, and effectiveness of these programs and policies.


The first two papers study ways in which spillovers from administrative burden for one program can influence a broader set of outcomes – including participation in other programs. In the first paper, Richard and Bart study the impacts of changing TANF work requirements on both program participation and labor supply in Michigan. Using administrative data, they show that a policy reform that increased penalties for violating these requirements led to decreases in TANF program attachment, as well as reductions in SNAP and Medicaid enrollment among those still eligible. At the same time, they provide evidence that increasing penalties led to decreases in formal employment. In the second paper, Nadal-Fernandez, Pepin, and Schrader study the administrative burden that states face when responding to federal-level changes in TANF work requirements — including when a state is out of compliance. They start by empirically estimating the effects of the different components of these policy changes on low-income families, but they also discuss how compliance can lead to unintended consequences that work against the goal of promoting self-sufficiency.


The final two papers study solutions to well-documented administrative burden challenges. In the third paper, Santillano and Thomas present research on the Benefits Navigator — a software tool for caseworkers to decrease the informational costs of navigating the safety net in Los Angeles — including both benefits and tax credits. Using administrative data from the tool and survey data from an initial pilot, the authors provide promising evidence that the tool can lead to increases in both program take-up and earnings. The authors also describe the empirical value of a tool that highlights benefit-earnings trade-offs for clients to remove uncertainty around employment decisions. In the final paper, Barofsky, Giannella, Herd, Jilke, and Moynihan study the impacts of an income-verification process change for Medicaid enrollment. In partnership with West Virginia and a technology company, the authors created and evaluated a process for income verification that favors reliable sources and uses agreed-upon defaults. This resulted in more efficient and timely eligibility processing with an overall increase in approvals — particularly for lower income individuals and children.

Policy Area

Secondary Policy Area

Chair

Discussants

Organizer

Individual Presentations