BackHome
Refresh: Off
Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Examining the Complexities of ECE Funding from a National-, State-, Program- & Family-Level Perspective

Thursday, November 5, 3:30 to 5:00pm, Property: Boston Marriott Copley Place, Floor: 3rd Floor, Room: Berkeley

Session Submission Type: Panel

Abstract

The U.S. continues to underinvest in children age birth to five, especially compared to K-12 students. The nation's federalist structure has produced fifty distinct early childhood education (ECE) funding systems, with dramatically different results for providers, families, and children. This panel asks: How is ECE funded across states, how do providers navigate systems to access that funding, and how do families experience the resulting system? Many ECE programs are not funded at levels allowing all eligible children to access high-quality ECE services. One strategy to address this gap is to use multiple funding sources to support the total cost of high-quality ECE. Yet, ECE financing mechanisms are fragmented and vary dramatically by state. As federal and state roles evolve, a comprehensive, multilevel picture of this landscape is more valuable than ever. This panel moves from a national and state-by-state picture of public ECE investments to how Head Start providers piece together funding to deliver comprehensive services, to how families access and experience publicly-funded child care within one state. The first paper draws on a systematic analysis of federal and state budget data across all fifty states, quantifying each state's mix of federal, state, and local funding—including Child Care and Development Block Grants (CCDBG), Head Start, home visiting, and early intervention/special education funds—producing the most complete picture of public ECE investments to date. A per capita framework enables direct comparison of ECE and K–12 spending. Findings show that for every dollar spent on a K-12 student, only 11 cents is spent on an infant or toddler, and 21 cents on a preschooler. Investment patterns vary widely across states, suggesting geography plays a significant role in early learning financing. The second paper draws on the first nationwide surveys of Head Start program directors and state ECE systems leaders on ECE financing. Findings unpack how many and which funding sources programs access beyond their federal grants, what those sources cover, and how program leaders experience combining them. Analyses link program-level financing practices to state context, including governance structures and the degree of Head Start integration into state ECE systems. The third paper examines how families in Georgia—where 90% of the state’s subsidies are funded through CCDBG—navigate and access ECE. Using state-wide family survey data, it explores (1) how subsidy receipt is associated with access to ECE and other benefits, (2) barriers families encounter in applying, and (3) gaps in access by demographic and systems factors. These findings connect the panel's systems-level analyses to on-the-ground realities and highlight where policy design and family experience diverge. These papers offer a rare multilevel view of ECE financing that spirals inward from the national picture to local implementation. Discussants—a policy research expert and state systems leader—will consider implications for sustaining ECE quality amid federal funding volatility, fragmented financing, workforce shortages, and persistent access barriers for families. As federal retrenchment accelerates, this panel provides timely, actionable evidence to inform more effective ECE financing strategies across all fifty states.

Policy Area

Chair

Discussants

Individual Presentations