Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
A number of factors inform judges’ decision-making processes, including: the law, case facts, judges’ ideologies and preferences. This paper asks how state trial judges’ colleagues’ identities affect their decisions. Scholars have shown that the introduction of one female or Black judge on an otherwise all male or White appellate panel can alter the votes of the male/White panel members. However this dynamic is understudied in trial courts where judges render their decisions alone. Drawing from studies of panel effects, implicit bias, and the effects of group composition on individual decision making, we conduct a series of experiments to identify how and the extent to which the composition of judges’ groups of colleagues affect their decisions in criminal trials.