Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Forming opposition alliances in presidential autocracies entails selecting a single opposition candidate to compete against the incumbent autocrat. Yet, intra-opposition competition among party leaders frequently result in the failure to build such alliances. Under what conditions will alliance formation occur? This paper, part of an ongoing book project, utilizes the bargaining model of war to analyze the bargaining dynamics between opposition party leaders. Specifically, it proposes that uncertainty over the relative popularities of opposition party leaders leads to belligerent non-cooperation. Clear information about their relative popularities, however, leads to alliance formation. Opposition party leaders learn such information through previous elections, or through highly salient public events. A paired historical comparison of opposition alliance formation in autocratic Philippines and South Korea near the end of the Cold War tests the model’s propositions. Historical evidence comes from secondary literature, newspaper reports, and declassified American diplomatic cables and Congressional hearings.