Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Presidents' "unilateral" sway over policy is a perennial concern of scholars and the general public. Pending executive moves provoke media speculation about how much authority the President has to act. And though every theory of unilateral action presumes some level of discretion, empirical measurement of this concept has lagged behind. In this study, we leverage the judgement of experts and laypersons to discipline these discussions. We field surveys of academics and non-expert, online workforces, using a pairwise comparison framework to estimate the latent level of discretion contemporary U.S. presidents have in 53 policy areas. Our inter-disciplinary academic panel allows us to investigate the sensitivity of such estimates to field and education. Our non-expert survey is unique, in that it allows us to -- for the first time -- take stock of popular misconceptions about presidential power. Finally, we compare our estimates to existing measures derived from statutes and appropriations, and test the received wisdom that executive discretion leads to more action.