Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Public evaluations of the economy are key for understanding how citizens assess system performance and vote in elections. But despite their importance, we still have much to learn about what drives these evaluations. In this article, we argue that an overlooked source of variation in economic perceptions is the information environment. In high-quality information environments where the government is transparent, the media is free, and political opposition is robust, public perceptions are closely informed by economic reality. Compromised information environments, however, provide an opening for political manipulation, leading perceptions to deviate from business cycle fluctuations. We test our argument with aggregate data from eight Latin American countries. Results show the public has distorted views of economic performance when access to information is restricted. Our findings suggest that the ability of voters to sanction governments is stronger when democratic institutions and the media protect citizens’ access to independent, unbiased information.
Ryan Carlin, Georgia State University
Gregory Love, University of Mississippi
Cecilia Martinez-Gallardo, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Matthew Singer, University of Connecticut
Timothy Hellwig, Indiana University, Bloomington