Attitudinal and Emotional Consequences of Islamist Terrorism

• In Event: Engagement in Terrorism: Causes and Consequences

Abstract

Studies about Islamist inspired terror attacks in the Western world have identified a recently declining impact on public opinion. What explains this development? I argue that the wider audience of terrorist attacks has become cognitively and emotionally desensitized. Cognitive desensitization occurs when citizens increasingly expect an attack, hence changes in attitudes become unnecessary. Emotional desensitization occurs when audiences lose sensitivity to attacks, tempering emotional arousal. To assess these claims, I analyze a survey conducted around the Berlin Christmas Market attack in 2016 and account for baseline information, an approach not used before due to data limitations. I find that attitudes like trust in government, national identification and views of Islam remain unchanged. Sadness and anger are heightened in the immediate aftermath of the attack. The wider German audience may thus have expected an attack, but still be emotionally sensitive to it in the short term. These findings are relevant as, in the wake of terror attacks, political leaders have justified important policy changes in fields like migration, civil liberties and even war-making with reference to supposed shifts in public opinion.

Author

• Enzo Nussio, ETH Zurich