Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
What influences national leaders’ decision to conduct a third-party intervention? This study uses quantitative analysis to evaluate the relationship between national leaders’ military-related experiences and their decision to intervene in another state’s intrastate conflicts. A powerful and violent experience such as participating in active combat can make people become more accepting of violence, risk-seeking, and in favor of using force. More specifically, it finds that leaders who have served in a national military, participated in actual combat, and been part of a rebel group are more likely to conduct a third-party intervention. By providing empirical evidence on the relationship between leaders’ experiences and third-party intervention, this study aims to better understand the role of national leaders’ as individuals in international security.