Comparing Three Models of Policing for Safeguarding Quality Urban Environment

• In Event: Representation at the Frontline: Local Policing and Enforcement

Abstract

Two governmental authorities – the police and local municipalities – are entrusted with the maintenance of law, order and public safety. Protecting people from everything from crime to pubic disorder requires both parties to extend resources for that end. Hence, cooperation is essential for efficiency and effective results. In some countries the police are an integral department of the local authority, whereas others prefer national policing. The relevant literature discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each of these patterns in detail and attention has been given to the of insufficient treatment of minor nuisances that impact the citizens quality of life.
In recent years, Israel has introduced two unique alternative models of local policing operating alongside the traditional model, in large and medium-size municipalities. Having three different models of policing – the municipal model, the integrated model, and the classic national policing model – function simultaneously in different localities provides an opportunity to investigate their comparable effectiveness in terms of optimizing value for the public (Moore, 1995; Moore, 2013).
To achieve this goal, in-depth interviews with officials from relevant departments of seven municipalities were conducted and policy documents, legislation, crime statistics and administrative data concerning relevant incidents were analysed. The research shows a newly created power-balance between the local and national authorities, enabling energetic, collaborative relationship, contributing to the local community's quality of life while preserving the advantages of both the national and the local policing models, providing answers to their drawbacks, and produces unique benefits.

Authors

• Irit Porat, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

• Fany Yuval, Ben-Gurion University