Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Existing research has identified several factors influencing a state’s decision to utilize mass killing. Among these is the robust relationship between primary resources and civil conflict as identified by civil war scholars. Relatedly, recent work in international political economy suggests that foreign direct investment also affects civil unrest. This article contributes to the growing study of globalization’s effect on political violence by exploring the joint effect of foreign direct investment in the primary sector resources on civil conflict. Using logistic regression and a new longitudinal, historical data set of political mass killings, we suggest a novel approach for understanding the factors that affect state actors' decision to use mass killing. We argue that high levels of foreign investment in extractive resources supplement a state’s income during episodes of mass killing, thus increasing the likelihood of such an event occurring. We find that foreign direct investment flows in primary sector resources like oil production are both statistically and substantively important in explaining state actors' decision to use mass killing.