Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Political commentators place substantial normative value on “policy wonks” in Congress, and legislative scholars emphasize the importance of specialization and expertise in the legislative policymaking process. Accordingly, specialization is frequently identified as key to a member of Congress being legislatively effective. Even so, relative to other areas of legislative behavior, scholars know comparatively less about the causes and consequences of members of Congress adopting specialized agendas. To explore these issues, I present an approach for capturing “legislative commitment” among members of Congress that accounts for the substantive, temporal, and procedural aspects of specialization. I show that legislative commitment plays a complementary role in determining MCs’ legislative productivity, amplifying the value of institutional positions of power. These findings provide new insight into what it means for a member of Congress to be a “policy wonk” and how the composition of a member’s legislative agenda is related to the course of his or her career.