Who's Science Is It?: Organized Interests in Science and Technology Policy

• In Event: Advances in Theories of the Policy Process

Abstract

In this project, we utilize Punctuated Equilibrium Theory to analyze the content and substance of congressional hearings on science and technology policy since WWII. Based on previous research the authors have conducted, we do know that congressional policy activity related to science has increased substantially. However, we don’t know whether this activity is indicative of increased support for or increased disagreements about government support for science and technology policy. Additionally, the broader science and technology literature speculates that scientists themselves aren’t generally involved in debates about science and technology policy because they are uncomfortable with the politics of policymaking on issues of science and technology. However, this assumption isn’t tested in the literature. A closer examination of congressional hearings in terms of who is called to testify and the nature of that testimony will enlighten us on not only what types of individuals and groups are most involved in the policymaking process, but also their positions on support for science and technology. Finally, this project critically engages prominent theories of policymaking that suggest that due to lack of salience and technical complexity, science and technology policymaking is unlikely to be carefully scrutinized by Congress.

Authors

• Renée J. Johnson, Rhodes College

• Erin A Dolgoy, Rhodes College